My research approaches eating disorders from two angles. The first is a behavioural, dynamical-systems perspective. The latest on this was published in July 2020 in Frontiers in Psychology:
Troscianko, E.T., and Leon, M. (2020). Treating eating: A dynamical systems theory of eating disorders.
This is my fullest attempt so far to articulate what I think eating disorders are and how I think we should be treating them. The essence of it is that behavioural change is the most effective way to bring about both physiological and psychological change. I.e., to treat the disorder, treat the eating.
The second angle is bibliotherapy, or reading for therapeutic purposes. This empirical paper in the Journal of Eating Disorders reports on the results of a large online survey asking people about their reading habits in connection with their eating disorder:
Troscianko, E.T. (2018). Literary reading and eating disorders: Survey evidence of therapeutic help and harm.
This study generated an unexpected, and unexpectedly strong, result: that individuals typically perceive reading fiction about eating disorders as strongly detrimental to their health on multiple dimensions, whereas they reported reading their preferred type of other fiction as mostly neutral or positive, especially for mood. This goes against mainstream thinking that reading about the condition you have should be helpful, and offers far more concrete evidence than we had before that reading can play a significant role in how an eating disorder develops or is recovered from.
In a paper for Medical Humanities, I made a more theoretical case for the relevance of reading to mental health, and especially eating disorders:
Troscianko, E.T. (2018). Fiction-reading for good or ill: Eating disorders, interpretation, and the case for creative bibliotherapy research
(Here‘s also a little audio clip for the Medical Humanities blog of me talking about how the research happened and why I think it’s important.)
Or you can also read short pieces I’ve written or contributed to on bibliotherapy:
for Medium.com: How do your reading habits shape your health—and vice versa?
for The Conversation: New research explores how reading affects eating disorders – for good and ill
and for the Oxford University Arts Blog: Artistic licence: Why a book might not save your life
If you’re currently suffering from an eating disorder or your recovery is still fragile, my simplest recommendation would be: read stuff you love reading, and ditch the ED stuff.
And if you’re wondering how these two approaches fit together, since one seems quite squarely behaviourist and the other rather more psychological in focus: I don’t see any conflict. To me it’s clear that you don’t get over an eating disorder without sorting out your eating, but there are many other factors that make it harder or easier to get to the point of acknowledging that and acting accordingly. We understand both the “sorting out your eating” and the other factors that feed into the capacity to do so (or its absence) remarkably badly, despite many decades’ accumulated research, and the effects of cultural inputs like fiction and poetry are just one example of that general ignorance.
I think the most promising overarching framework for eating-disorders research is a dynamical-systems approach which understands physiology, psychology, and behaviour as connected by complex feedback interactions. If you’d like to read more about how I see this model playing out and therefore the two focal points of behaviour change and literary reading as intersecting, see the final section of the Frontiers (2020) paper above (“Putting it all together”) or this book chapter on “Feedback in reading and disordered eating” (2017).
My background in cognitive literary studies: What happens when we read
My academic background is in cognitive literary studies: investigating psychological interactions between texts and readers. I coined the term ‘cognitive realism’ to describe texts which represent some aspect of the human mind in a way that corresponds how it actually works in the mind of the reader, and I’ve explored all kinds of ways in which cognitively realistic and unrealistic texts might prompt us to respond to them differently, in terms of emotional responses as well as the mental images we experience and the meanings we generate. You can find out more about my work on visual perception and the ‘Kafkaesque’, on memory in Proust (yes, that madeleine—but saying something new about it!), on cognitive dissonance in Flaubert, and much else besides, on my personal website or via ResearchGate.
Moving into the health humanities: What health-relevant things happen when we read
My interest in the links between fiction-reading and mental health started with a story by Franz Kafka called, fittingly enough, ‘A Hunger Artist’ (Ein Hungerkünstler, which you may like to read in the German original or in a translation by Ian Johnston). In this story, published in 1919, a man fasts for other people’s entertainment, but gradually those people are losing interest. As his audiences dwindle, the hunger artist keeps fasting. I had already read the story many times, but suddenly, rereading it again, I realised something strange—or two things. First, the hunger artist is never once described as feeling any hunger. Second, I had never once noticed that the hunger artist isn’t described as feeling any hunger. Given my own past experience of anorexia, this struck me as odd. I wrote an article exploring how the text’s evocation of starvation might prompt different responses from readers with different personal histories, and how easy it is to fall into the trap of interpreting what you assume is in a text rather than what is—especially when it comes to judgements about bodies and (not) eating.
Soon afterwards, I established a partnership with the leading UK eating-disorders charity, Beat, to start to explore the connections between fiction-reading and mental health empirically. We ran an online survey which attracted nearly 900 respondents. Their thoughtful, detailed responses have generated four publications so far:
- an account of the survey methods and findings in the Journal of Eating Disorders, presenting the clear though counterintuitive finding that reading about eating disorders is perceived as almost universally damaging [open-access here, or download: Literary-reading-and-eating-disorders_survey-evidence-of-therapeutic-help-and-harm_Troscianko-2018]
- an argument for the wider importance of taking fiction-reading seriously in mental-health research, in Medical Humanities [download:Fiction-reading-for-good-or-ill_eating-disorders-interpretation-and-creative-bibliotherapy-research_Troscianko-2018]
- a chapter in Cognitive Literary Science on the mind-body feedback loops in which reading can play a role [download: Feedback-in-reading-and-disordered-eating_Troscianko-2017]
- and a chapter in Aesthetic Illusion in Literature and the Arts on how readers talk about the ways they get immersed in what they read, and what therapeutic relevance this might have [download: How-should-we-talk-about-reading-experiences_Troscianko-2017_formatted-preprint].
I also helped design and run a reading-group project called Books, Minds, and Bodies, which brought together academics from the cognitive, medical, and neurosciences, and from anthropology, literary studies, and psychiatry joined members of the Oxfordshire public to share the experience of reading aloud and discussing a novel in order to explore the therapeutic benefits of reading fiction. Our write-up of our findings is currently under review.
I’m now building on these activities with other empirical projects designed to pin down the cause-and-effect relationships between different kinds of reading and helpful or harmful effects on mental health.
My current projects include:
- a collaboration with Rocío Riestra Camacho, a PhD student at the University of Oviedo, who is running an experiment testing readers’ responses to two young adult sports fiction novels, with or without a specially designed reading guide;
- and a collaboration with James Carney, Wellcome Fellow in Medical Humanities at Brunel University, London, on the realtime dynamics of textual reception and creation of pro-eating disorder content on Twitter.
In this area we urgently need fewer assumptions (either that art is useless in health terms or that it’s obviously always edifying) and more testing of them. Please get in touch if you have ideas for research that ought to be done and would like my input. I may not be able to help, but I can try, or point you towards others who might be able to.